Good or Bad Government

This post includes an email exchange with Evan Knappenberger, a Friend with whom I regularly worship at the Seekers’ Haven Worship Group, a Conservative Friends online group that meets each First-day morning for worship.  Evan is a graduate student, an Iraq war veteran, and has two degrees in theology. He often ministers in our worship sessions, and I am always led to listen closely, because he speaks with sincerity and a sense of the faith. Evan’s contribution to this post is a story about two Trump canvassers who appear on the protagonist’s doorstep one October afternoon and the response given to them. Evan sent the story to a local newspaper and to me, asking for my response, which is copied after the story.

Evan’s writing begins:

Dealing With Fascism at Your Door: A Friendly City Primer

By E.K. Knappenberger

for the Harrisonburg Citizen, 10/24/2024

It was 4:30 on a warm October Harrisonburg afternoon, and I was just sitting down to my 900-level university creative writing workshop on zoom, when the doorbell rang. The dogs immediately went nuts. Annoyed, I got up thinking that some important business was at hand. I was right, but not in the way I expected.

When I opened the door and stepped outside, two pasty, rotund old ladies were standing there with Trump literature. “Hello!” they tried to sound cheerful but they looked exhausted, “I’m Betty and this is Linda. We want you to vote republican.” They pushed some glitzy propaganda in my face. 

My first reaction, which I suppressed successfully, was to hiss, to rant, or to confront. Like many people who are not in the cult of the spray tan Mammon, I find the presence of the (somewhat more rare than last time) Trump signs and stickers to be a threat to everything that I hold dear as an American and as a Christian. Because of their convict-idol’s rhetoric of violence, which has explicitly called for the imprisonment and execution of those of us who helped the democratic party, it is not unreasonable to feel threatened by the mere presence of trumpian hate speech. The little old ladies walking around our town, who are by many reputable press accounts paid by shadowy post-Citizens United billionaire cash contributions, represent something much more sinister than appearances suggest.

Precisely because the self-described wannabe dictator has said repeatedly that anyone who stands in the way of his “extreme power” will face violent “bloody” consequences, I myself (along with the majority of my fellow Harrisonburgians who refuse to consent to authoritarian takeover of the federal government) have been forced to grapple with the hard truth that, like many countries on the brink of massive political violence in the past, one third of America would likely exterminate another third of America, while the last third did nothing to stop it from happening. Betty and Linda, despite their benign-seeming presence on our Harrisonburg front porches, whether they know it or not, are harbingers of death. I can say this as a historian, but also as a combat veteran and former intelligence analyst who witnessed a genocide up close. Every moral fiber in me revolts in disgust from watching such people advocate their death cult among the good people in our land of putative freedom.

My friend Sofia Samatar, in her beautiful meditations perambulating the Friendly City, recently wrote in her column describing the reactionary violence of a deranged diner at Capital Ale House, who verbally assaulted her children for purely political reasons. What does one do in such situations? What can one do against such pernicious, deep seated evil? As a Christian and as a thinking person I offer the following template, a Friendly City primer on telling off those trumpian idolaters who spread their evil in our little corner of the world. A template of certain terms and theological language that no true Christian can deny. Let me also add that one needn’t be a believing Christian to engage in the kind of theological argumentation below — Lord knows, there are scant few believing Christians among the Trump idolaters. But of course, it helps to be familiar with the New Testament to make a convincing argument as I have suggested below.

“Betty, Linda,” you can say with some practice, “I am glad that God has led you here for us to learn something today. Pray with me.” You can take their hands if you want, bow your head, and screw your eyes up tight. Before they can start talking, continue in a tone approaching prayerfulness.

“Lord, we know that you sent your only begotten Son, Jesus, so that we might not perish but have eternal life. We know this from the Gospel of John, chapter three, Lord. You told us that Christ Was, in the beginning, before the creation of the world, that he Was and Is and always Will Be your holy Word. We know that from John chapter one.”

Take a deep breath but don’t wait too long. Continue.

“Almighty God, we know that your Living Word Jesus Christ is the Truth, by whom alone we are sanctified (John chapter 17 verse 17); and that the Truth alone can set us free in body and in spirit (John chapter 8, verse 32). Heavenly father, we know that Jesus left us the Holy Spirit, who is an Advocate of God’s Truth (John 14:16) who alone can defend us and whom alone we should trust.”

Here you can begin to build your prayer louder so that all your neighbors can hear. Continue in power with conviction if possible.

“We also know that to blaspheme this Holy Spirit of Truth is an unpardonable sin. (Mark 3:28, Matt 12:31, Luke 12:10). Lord, we know that lies alone such as Trump makes every day, are a sin; but we confess to you Lord that when we blaspheme the spirit of Truth itself, as Trump also does daily, we are assaulting the very nature of our God’s goodness, freedom and aid. We are bothered, Lord, when worldly leaders like Trump lie openly, and even moreso when they expect the Truth to conform to their unholy word.”

 “We are perplexed when trumpian apologists ask, like Pontius Pilate, “what even is truth?” (John 18:38). But Lord, we are utterly confounded when the idolaters of Trump, like the pharisees who sought to murder your Word made Flesh, act in order to destroy every notion of what is true and what is false. (John 7 through 9). Help us to repent, Lord, of the blasphemous notion that Trump’s satanic lies are little white ones! Help us recant the diabolical assertion that while Trump is often factually incorrect, that he is still somehow correct in spirit, or in orientation. This, we confess to you, all-knowing God, is the blasphemy of placing Satan’s lies on the altar of your Truth.”

“In the name of Christ, we renounce the demons in Betty and in Linda and in all those possessed by the spirit of lies. We repent their worship of a false idol on their TV screens. Almighty one, save us, drive the lie-loving power-hungry exploitative ones who mislead these little old ladies into a lake of fire (Rev. 20:10) as you have promised. Father, do not wait to save us from the falseness of those who blaspheme and who seek the death of your servants (Psalm 38). 

“How long, Adonai, will you suffer your Truth to be trampled and devoured by lying, unclean hypocrites? (Matt 7:6).  But save us, let your Truth set these deceived ones free, and deliver us from the evil of Trump and his satanic snares, as you have promised. Take these two women, God. Turn their rotten hearts toward you, O Lord! Open their scaly eyes and teach them to stop causing others to stumble! Force them to unbind their deformed consciences, Lord! Chastise them that they might be saved from the evil they think they want to commit in the name of Trump!”

Let go of Betty’s and Linda’s hands, but before they can respond, say quickly “Go and sin no more! ” and be sure not to slam the door too hard in their faces.

Patricia wrote:

Thanks for this, Evan. I think you have zeroed in on the main issue: the avalanche of deceit that has been the mainstay of Trump’s public performance these past eight years. There are plenty of other behaviors that make him offensive, but the continual violation of truth is—as you have written—to “blaspheme the spirit of Truth itself . . .  [is to] assault[ing] the very nature of our God’s goodness, freedom and aid.” And in  Matthew 12:32, Jesus confirms the condemnation resulting from this assault. To speak against the Holy Ghost, the spirit of Truth, is to nullify in oneself the true standard and power by which one is guided to righteousness. Though lying about particulars is damaging to one’s soul, to deface the living law in the heart by which we discern truth is to render oneself incapable of functioning as a human being, i.e., a creature made in God’s image. This denial of Truth is the nature and beginning point of all evil words and actions, and is why the devil is called the father of lies. This is a problem that has plagued individuals throughout history, but it becomes exponentially terrible when social groups given to this blasphemy gain political power, as in Europe in the ’30s. 

It’s been particularly galling that Trump is getting support from so-called Christians. People need no further goad to despise Christians, as it’s been a mainstay of the entertainment industry for the past 60 years to see Christians as deceitful, hypocritical, and the contempt for Christians now permeates the psyches of most of the educated and spiritually immature. I keep my mind focused on the work of presenting sound understanding of the Way to those who love the Truth, as I do.  I have no expectation that those who have given over their God-given capacity to seek and love the Truth would be nudged to change their ways, nor that the spiritually immature might be transformed by my writing. That said, I think the deceitful can be shamed by having their behavior brought to light: their conscience might be pricked or their fear of social ostracization might influence them to take a new stance. I think your writing here is undergirded by that expectation: Who would want to see himself in unity with these two unthinking, buffaloed Trump supporters? I also used the technique of shaming bad behavior in my essay “The Ubiquitous War of the Lamb,” which was also anti-trump. Neither does Jesus hold back from calling out others (Matt. 11:21, 23:23).  

I am glad that you wrote this piece and sent it into the Harrisonburg paper. Please let me know if you hear of any response.

Your friend,

Pat

Allegory and Effects of Good and Bad Government (detail), Ambrogio Lorenzetti, 1338-39, Siena’s Palazzo Pubblico frescos

8 thoughts on “Good or Bad Government”

  1. Just a little correction – really a typo. When you provided the news source to which Evan sent this, you used a similar city name but not the correct one – Harrisburg instead of the correct Harrisonburg. I am pretty sure of that since Evan does sometimes write for the Harrisonburg Citizen and there appears to be no Harrisburg Citizen.

    Like

  2. George Fox might have said that the serpent was speaking in the two women, Betty and Linda, who professed Christianity in words, but showed Friend Evan that they were in bondage to a quite different god: the satanic one that Paul called the god of this world (2 Cor 4:4). What should we do when such people confront us?

    My suggestion would be to ask Christ, our indwelling Lord, how to proceed. If He knows that Betty and Linda are no longer reachable by the Truth, or at least not reachable by us at this time, He may advise us to simply turn away from them, as Jesus turned away from Pilate. If words are necessary, a simple “I’m not willing to have this conversation” may suffice before we gently close the door on Betty and Linda. The Lord, who bids us love our enemies, may then ask us to pray for the two women, or He may not. But it’s important not to let ourselves despise them — lest we ourselves fall back into the ranks of bad-guy-haters.

    In any case, the Second Epistle to Timothy has good advice on avoiding foolish and ignorant inquiries, urging the Lord’s servant to act kindly toward everyone, ever willing to teach the ignorant, in case there’s any chance of a change of heart in them (2 Tim 2:23-26). God loved Betty and Linda enough to create them, and in fact wills their salvation (1 Tim 2:4). Jesus loved them enough to die for it. What should we do with Betty and Linda? Shame them for being stupid? Imagine their self-damnation and weep in pity? Murder them so they can’t vote?

    It’s tempting to think of Donald Trump as a fascist bully or a madman enslaved to the father of lies, as if others in the political world are not, or as if the corporate CEOs who drive the agendas and select the candidates of both parties will somehow give us “a kinder, gentler America” if we defeat Trump and his ilk at the polls. No, both parties are devoted to a politics of “let us do evil, so that good may come of it” (Rom 3:8), else we wouldn’t be engaged, under Republicans and Democrats alike, in endless genocidal wars and proxy-wars to perpetuate American prosperity and total-world-dominance; else we wouldn’t be maintaining a health-care system benefiting the insurance and pharmaceutical industries more than the suffering ill; else our grocery shelves wouldn’t be full of Frankenfood-products so enriched with high-fructose corn syrup and refined salt that consumers got addicted to these degraders of health; else we wouldn’t have an economy that defiled and destroyed soils, waters, atmospheres, and ecosystems. Else we might have communities of faith that challenged the “me-first” selfishness that animates world capitalism, and glorified, not the self-satisfied fallen creature, but the almighty, absolutely good God who is Love Itself.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for this comment. There is much that I agree with, and I also welcome the opportunity to examine the thoughts you’ve presented. What I wholeheartedly agree with is your recommendation to turn to Christ for clarity and direction, for only he can allow us to know the right path through the complexity.

      Reading 2nd Timothy this morning, I saw that it is the guidance an older minister is giving to a younger minister, which is largely to teach him how to remain faithful in the enervating world. The implication is that in remaining faithful, while enduring all things for the sake of the elect Seed, others also may be given to obtain salvation (10).

      Your second paragraph advises turning away from those hardened in their sin, as likewise does the Apostle at the beginning of chapter 3: turn away form those who have a form of godliness but deny the power (5). This, I believe, is to the end that the minister neither endanger his constancy nor waste his time. Again, the advise is to remain strong in faith so that the gospel work go forward; it is not to prescribe a principle that would be universally applicable. Sometimes turning away is not the right course but instead reproving, rebuking, and exhorting is called for: using argument, reproof, and appeal, with all the patience the work of teaching requires (4:2).

      Evan’s story, I think, was not an account of an actual occurrence but a fictional creation that possibly arose from an actual occurrence. It was (and I’m speculating here) more akin to a parable in which the events are arranged to convey a lesson. One lesson Evan’s story conveys is Trump and his supporters do not have Christian validity, and their claim otherwise is a lie. He substantiates his assertion with Scripture and “certain terms and theological language that no true Christian can deny.” We have plenty of examples in Scripture of prophets and apostles calling out evil and ignorance that they be set aside so that a more judicious, righteous, inward understanding may enter. Is there a parable that doesn’t function this way?

      Your last paragraph, especially its first sentence, isn’t sensible. Is it “tempting” or is it true “to think of Donald Trump as a fascist bully or a madman enslaved to the father of lies”; it can’t be both true and tempting, for truth is of God, and temptation is of the devil. That others in the political world may also be liars doesn’t affect the fact that Trump is, in fact, a fascist bully; we have plenty of evidence on record. All the problems you then list are ones I also deplore, but they must be addressed using the people’s compassion; judicious, rational thought; and confidence in our capacity to order our socio-political life through good government. One presidential candidate opposes all of these civilizing influences and therefore must be opposed.

      Like

      1. I was referring to chapter 2 when I wrote: “The implication is that in remaining faithful, while enduring all things for the sake of the elect Seed, others also may be given to obtain salvation (10).”

        Like

  3. I have been reminded by certain New Testament scholars that 2nd Timothy is almost assured pseudo-Pauline. Many scholars have problems with that epistle, including its approach toward women and families; both of these facts lead me to agree with Patricia about interpreting it in a limited context.

    If the Lord is the judge of hearts, and the prophetic function is to speak the truth the Lord has given one, then surely one can judge Trump on his own apart from the democrats, say. Pilate’s “what is truth?” sounds almost nearly like a modern non-voter who, full well knowing that Trump’s accession to power will mean the deaths and untold suffering of hundreds of millions of people, refuses to take a side because of some philosophical scruple or other.

    I think it is both good and right to proclaim the shame of shameful people, given that they themselves have proclaimed their nakedness to be of God. If their shame was some moralistic thing (simple adultery, say,) there is little use or sense in shaming them. But blasphemy against Truth is categorically different, we are told.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It seems to me that you, Anonymous, are not the same person as the first commenter, who also used that designation.

      I agree with you that “blasphemy against Truth is categorically different” from lying about particular facts; that’s what puts great distance between Trump and other politicians.

      Like

      1. Aha yes, sorry, a different Anonymous commentator. This one finds fault with any interpretation that would put, say, Jimmy Carter and Adolph Hitler on the same square because they are both politicians.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Bill Samuel Cancel reply